From: Issue 23 Categories: ideas

Carbon Tax Captains

Both money and power are converging around a carbon tax consensus, decimating traditional left-right lines of political demarcation.

Written by Toby A.A. Heaps, President

Image via flickr user Glasseyes view

This makes for some pretty odd bedfellows, ranging from the two Davids (Suzuki and Frum), to the Goreacle and Oracle. It also includes some of the main brain offsprings at the right-oriented CD Howe Institute (Jack Mintz) and the left-oriented Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (Marc Lee). The list of carbon tax captains extends to the former neo-con turned eco-con Premier Campbell of BC to Liberal heavies Dion and Ignatieff, all the way to the Minister of Finance Jim Prentice’s former chief of staff and now CEO of the National Roundtable on Environment and Economy, David Maclaughlin and yes, to the Green Ms May as well. The head economic counselor for the International Monetary Fund and Lester Brown, don of the World Watch Institute, round out the list of odd bedfellow carbon tax captains.

“I was in England a month ago talking to the Conservative Party, which has proposed a series of revenue-neutral ‘green taxes’ that would be offset by reductions in other taxes. I believe that approach merits consideration – and the most promising idea I’ve heard is to use the revenue from pollution pricing to cut the payroll tax. After all: employment is good, pollution is bad. Why shouldn’t we lower the cost of the good and raise the cost of the bad? Studies show that a pollution fee of $15 for every ton of greenhouse gas would allow us to return more than $500 a year to the average taxpayer. It would give all of us an incentive to reduce our energy use – whether that’s buying a more fuel-efficient appliance or making the switch to compact fluorescent light bulbs, as we’ve done in New York’s City Hall – and as I’ve done in my own home. And even though energy costs would rise, the savings from tax cuts and energy efficiencies could, over the long run, leave consumers with more money in their pockets. Creating a direct charge for greenhouse gas pollution would also incentivize the kinds of innovation that a cap-and-trade system is designed to encourage – without creating market uncertainty. To do this, a portion of the revenue from the pollution charge would be used to create an innovation fund, which would finance tax credits for companies that reduce their greenhouse gas pollution.”
-Mayor Michael Bloomberg

Share |

Featured Content from Issue 23 See all content

Feature

 

Air. Earth. Fire. Water. The four classical elements help to conceptualize environmental impact, and aid in the classification of a wide variety of ecological measures.

Feature

 Food experts explore the local food movement's barriers and growth

Feature

What's the deal?

Feature

Pushing the Limits Interview with William McDonough.

Cover Story

Buying your greens from a Canadian grocery chain? Those greens may not be as “green” as you think. According to a 2007 poll by Decima Research, two-thirds of Canadian consumers say concern for the environment is impacting the way they shop. But are Canadian grocery stores listening?

Cover Story

Buying your greens from a Canadian grocery chain? Those greens may not be as “green” as you think. According to a 2007 poll by Decima Research, two-thirds of Canadian consumers say concern for the environment is impacting the way they shop. But are Canadian grocery stores listening?