From: Issue 34 Categories: Podcast

Nordic lab: Distilling urban sustainability lessons from abroad

21 April, 2011

While Copenhagen tackles carbon neutrality, Toronto bickers over bike lanes. How did Nordic cities get so far ahead?

Written by Julia Barnes, Former Editorial Intern

Photo by Hopkinsii via Flickr

Canadian cities have been making serious plans for the sustainable management of their ongoing growth. Corporate Knights Sustainable Cities ranking put Vancouver, Victoria and Toronto ahead of the rest in Canada but with a top grade of only 71%, there's still a long way for our cities to go.

If we look across the Atlantic to cities in the Nordic countries, we'll find a lot more than reindeer and the Ikea headquarters. As a region, these countries have a lot in common with Canada--a comparable population size, high levels of education, similar climate, and a similar concern for the environment--but their cities are ahead of us in many areas of sustainable planning, including green transportation, green building, and emissions reductions.

Why are we behind our Nordic counterparts? And what can we learn from them? In this podcast, Corporate Knights reporter Julia Barnes speaks to municipal representatives from Helsinki, Reykjavik, and Stockholm, as well as Toronto's Chief Planner Gary Wright and Evergreen's Executive Director Geoff Cape about the factors that can hold us back or propel us forward.

The interviews in this podcast were conducted at the CanNord conference held in Toronto on March 23, 2011 and organized by the Nordic Innovation Centre, the Swedish Trade Council, Innovation Norway, the Danish Trade Council, and Nordic Energy Research.

Music in this podcast includes See you later and Hidden Blues by Pitx, Reverie by _ghost, and Relief by Gurdonark.

Share |

Featured Content from Issue 34 See all content

Feature

 Big cities may reverse climate change

 

Report

Ranking the most sustainable large Canadian urban centres.

Report

The 9th Annual Responsible Investing Guide

Feature

by

 CPPIB may be leaving significant profits on the table by failing to invest in green buildings.