Search

The 2015 Corporate Knights Better World MBA Ranking includes the 100 schools from the 2015 Financial Times Global MBA Ranking plus all additional schools (a total of 21) who ranked among the Top 30 in the MBA rankings by Corporate Knights in 2012, 2013, 2014, and responded in the affirmative to an invitation to be included. In future years, the Better World MBA ranking universe will be further expanded to include any accredited MBA schools who request to be included via email to research [@] corporateknights.com. There is no cost to be included in the Better World MBA ranking.

The 2015 Corporate Knights Better World MBA Ranking schools were assessed on three indicators: curriculum, institutes & centres and faculty research. Data for these three indicators was collected from publicly available sources. Outreach was conducted to each of those schools for verification and confirmation prior to completion of the ranking.

1.     Curriculum: Only core/required courses fully dedicated to sustainability were counted under the scoring. (maximum 5 courses, 30 per cent weighting)

2.     Institutes & Centres: Only relevant institutes affiliated to the business school regardless of location, sponsored or ran in partnership with another school, were counted towards the scoring. (maximum 5 institutes and centres, 20 per cent weighting)

3.     Faculty Research: All research was conducted using the business school’s website and Google Scholar. All relevant peer-reviewed publications in academic journals were considered between 2012 and 2014. Thirty per cent of the final score was derived from total number of relevant publications authored or co-authored per faculty member of a given business school (maximum total published work: faculty ratio of 1:1, 30 per cent weighting). The other 20 per cent is in relation to the total number of times those publications were cited (maximum average citations=10, 20 per cent weighting).


 

Methodology rationale:

A great society is a society in which its business leaders think greatly of their functions.

Business schools are the training grounds for future business leaders. While there are many business rankings that focus how they can help graduates make more money, The Better World MBA Ranking aims to identify which MBAs best equip graduates to change the world for the better. As the march to a more inclusive, socially, and ecologically just form of capitalism gathers steam, it is our hope that these new graduates will not only produce the highest returns for society and the planet, but they will also be handsomely rewarded by the market for doing so.

How to measure the “better world” component of an MBA is an inexact science. After a decade of running MBA rankings on the topic, we have learned some important lessons:

  1. Provide a clear vision on the goal of the ranking.
  2. Keep it simple, transparent, and objective.
  3. Do not make the ranking dependent on schools having to fill out yet another survey.

The vision of the Better World MBA Ranking is to help ensure future business leaders know how to integrate social and environmental factors into their thinking, whether it’s how to do full-cost accounting, build inclusive leadership and governance structures, or engage in ethical marketing. We aim to do this by:

  1. Providing a complementary resource to prospective MBA students that helps them to identify which schools are on the cutting edge of making the world a better place.
  2. Providing a carrot of positive recognition to leading MBAs (Top 40) and a stick of reprimand to those that are lagging.

In terms of ranking methodology, we focus on the three most important metrics we can obtain in the public domain: # of MBA core courses, # of research centres and institutes at the business school, and volume of faculty research on better world topics.

In order for a MBA programme to achieve top marks, it has to do three things:

  1. Have at least five research centres dedicated to better world topics such as sustainable finance or clean energy or gender diversity (please see Better World Taxonomy here for full list of eligible themes).
  2. Have five core courses that meaningfully integrate social and environmental into the course materials and instruction, as determined by headline prominence of such themes in the course title or short description.
  3. Be publishing at least one professional research paper per faculty every three years that is cited by at least 10 other sources, according to Google Scholar.

The thinking is that any school fulfilling the above criteria is likely to be offering interested students meaningful exposure to learn how to integrate social and environmental factors into their management function via the core MBA courses, faculty expertise and research centres.

The target of five courses, five research centres, and one well cited professional research paper per faculty every three years reflects current best practices, and accommodates a variety of business school structures and sizes.


Corporate Knights Notice and Disclaimer

This document and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the property of Corporate Knights Inc. known herein as “Corporate Knights” and is provided for informational purposes only. The Information may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced or redisseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from Corporate Knights.

The Information may not be used to create indexes, databases, risk models, analytics, software, or in connection with the issuing, offering, sponsoring, managing or marketing of any securities, portfolios, financial products or other investment vehicles utilizing or based on, linked to, tracking or otherwise derived from the Information or any other Corporate Knights data, information, products or services.

The user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. CORPORATE KNIGHTS DOES NOT MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION (OR THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE USE THEREOF).

Information containing any historical information, data or analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
None of the Information constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), any security, financial product or other investment vehicle or any trading strategy.

The Information may contain back tested data. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. There are frequently material differences between back tested performance results and actual results subsequently achieved by any investment strategy.

Constituents of Corporate Knights equity indexes or stock lists are listed companies, which are included in or excluded from the indexes or lists according to the application of the relevant methodologies. Accordingly, constituents in Corporate Knights equity indexes or lists may include Corporate Knights, clients of Corporate Knights or suppliers to Corporate Knights. Inclusion of a security within a Corporate Knights index or list is not a recommendation by Corporate Knights to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice.

Corporate Knights receives compensation in connection with licensing its indexes to third parties. Corporate Knights Inc.’s revenue includes fees based on assets in Index Linked Investments.
Any use of or access to products, services or information of Corporate Knights requires a license from Corporate Knights. Corporate Knights brands and product names are the trademarks, service marks, or registered trademarks of Corporate Knights and its subsidiaries in Canada, United States and other jurisdictions.

 

Related Articles